Close Menu
    DevStackTipsDevStackTips
    • Home
    • News & Updates
      1. Tech & Work
      2. View All

      CodeSOD: A Unique Way to Primary Key

      July 22, 2025

      BrowserStack launches Figma plugin for detecting accessibility issues in design phase

      July 22, 2025

      Parasoft brings agentic AI to service virtualization in latest release

      July 22, 2025

      Node.js vs. Python for Backend: 7 Reasons C-Level Leaders Choose Node.js Talent

      July 21, 2025

      The best CRM software with email marketing in 2025: Expert tested and reviewed

      July 22, 2025

      This multi-port car charger can power 4 gadgets at once – and it’s surprisingly cheap

      July 22, 2025

      I’m a wearables editor and here are the 7 Pixel Watch 4 rumors I’m most curious about

      July 22, 2025

      8 ways I quickly leveled up my Linux skills – and you can too

      July 22, 2025
    • Development
      1. Algorithms & Data Structures
      2. Artificial Intelligence
      3. Back-End Development
      4. Databases
      5. Front-End Development
      6. Libraries & Frameworks
      7. Machine Learning
      8. Security
      9. Software Engineering
      10. Tools & IDEs
      11. Web Design
      12. Web Development
      13. Web Security
      14. Programming Languages
        • PHP
        • JavaScript
      Featured

      The Intersection of Agile and Accessibility – A Series on Designing for Everyone

      July 22, 2025
      Recent

      The Intersection of Agile and Accessibility – A Series on Designing for Everyone

      July 22, 2025

      Zero Trust & Cybersecurity Mesh: Your Org’s Survival Guide

      July 22, 2025

      Execute Ping Commands and Get Back Structured Data in PHP

      July 22, 2025
    • Operating Systems
      1. Windows
      2. Linux
      3. macOS
      Featured

      A Tomb Raider composer has been jailed — His legacy overshadowed by $75k+ in loan fraud

      July 22, 2025
      Recent

      A Tomb Raider composer has been jailed — His legacy overshadowed by $75k+ in loan fraud

      July 22, 2025

      “I don’t think I changed his mind” — NVIDIA CEO comments on H20 AI GPU sales resuming in China following a meeting with President Trump

      July 22, 2025

      Galaxy Z Fold 7 review: Six years later — Samsung finally cracks the foldable code

      July 22, 2025
    • Learning Resources
      • Books
      • Cheatsheets
      • Tutorials & Guides
    Home»Development»Clothing Retailer Todd Snyder Penalized $345,178 Over Consumer Privacy Failures

    Clothing Retailer Todd Snyder Penalized $345,178 Over Consumer Privacy Failures

    May 7, 2025

    CPPA

    The California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) has announced that national clothing retailer Todd Snyder, Inc. must pay a $345,178 fine and make substantial changes to its privacy practices. The decision comes after the agency’s Enforcement Division found that the company violated several key provisions of the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA).

    These issues reflect broader concerns the CPPA has previously highlighted. In fact, the agency had issued an enforcement advisory last year cautioning businesses about the risks of collecting too much information when consumers exercise their privacy rights.

    Privacy Violations Identified by CPPA

    The CPPA’s Enforcement Division alleged that Todd Snyder failed to comply with California’s privacy law in multiple ways:

    • Failure to Process Consumer Opt-Out Requests: For a period of 40 days, the company’s privacy portal was not properly configured. As a result, requests from consumers to opt out of the sale or sharing of their personal data were not processed.
    • Excessive Information Collection: When customers submitted privacy-related requests, the company required them to provide more personal information than was necessary to process these requests. This ran counter to CCPA guidelines, which emphasize minimal data collection.
    • Unnecessary Identity Verification: Consumers were also required to verify their identity even to opt out of personal data sales or sharing — a step that is generally not required under CCPA unless sensitive information is being accessed or deleted.

    Todd Snyder’s Settlement and Compliance Measures

    To resolve the allegations, Todd Snyder has agreed to:

    • Pay a $345,178 fine.
    • Implement internal changes to better support consumer privacy rights.
    • Properly configure its online privacy portal to ensure opt-out requests are received and processed correctly.
    • Provide CCPA compliance training for its employees.

    The settlement marks one of several enforcement actions by the CPPA aimed at ensuring businesses take their responsibilities under California’s privacy laws seriously.

    Michael Macko, who leads the agency’s Enforcement Division, commented on the case: “Businesses should scrutinize their privacy management solutions to ensure they comply with the law and work as intended, because the buck stops with the businesses that use them. Using a consent management platform doesn’t get you off the hook for compliance.”

    The Importance of Opt-Out Rights

    The CPPA stressed that this case highlights the importance of opt-out rights under the CCPA. These rights give Californians the ability to limit how businesses collect, use, and share their personal data — a vital control as companies increasingly gather and analyze information from every customer interaction.

    Tom Kemp, Executive Director of the CPPA, reinforced the agency’s message:

    “Opt-out rights are one way for Californians to assert control over their personal information and protect themselves from real harms. The board’s decision should serve as an important reminder that our Enforcement Division is scrutinizing what businesses are doing to honor Californians’ privacy rights.”

    According to the CPPA, improper use or sharing of personal information can expose consumers to serious risks, especially when data relates to sensitive topics like health, immigration, finances, religion, or ethnicity.

    A Broader Pattern of Enforcement

    This is not the first time the CPPA has taken action against companies for violating privacy laws. In recent months, the agency has ramped up enforcement to protect consumers, reflecting a broader commitment to ensuring privacy regulations are properly implemented and enforced. Some recent actions include:

    • American Honda Motor Co. was ordered to pay a $632,500 fine and revise its privacy practices, marking the second-highest fine in the history of the CCPA.
    • Background Alert, a data broker known for claiming it could uncover “scary” amounts of personal information, was required to either shut down operations or pay a significant penalty.
    • National Public Data, Inc., a Florida-based data broker, faced enforcement action after a data breach exposed millions of Americans’ Social Security numbers and other personal data.
    • The CPPA also launched the Consortium of Privacy Regulators, a bipartisan coalition designed to support enforcement of privacy laws nationwide.
    • In addition, the agency has partnered with international privacy watchdogs in Korea, France, and the United Kingdom, showing its commitment to cross-border collaboration in safeguarding Californians’ data.

    These efforts come on the heels of several other actions, including penalties against unregistered data brokers and an investigative sweep into how these entities are complying with California’s Delete Act, a law aimed at helping consumers permanently delete personal data held by data brokers.

    A Reminder to Review Compliance

    Beyond enforcement, the CPPA remains focused on its mission to educate both consumers and businesses about privacy rights and obligations. The agency regularly issues advisories and guidance documents, helping organizations navigate complex compliance issues.

    Businesses operating in California — or offering goods and services to Californians — are required to understand and honor the privacy choices of consumers.

    The Todd Snyder case reinforces the need to:

    • Audit and test privacy systems regularly.
    • Minimize data collection for privacy request processing.
    • Avoid unnecessary identity verification for opt-out requests.
    • Ensure that third-party privacy platforms and tools are compliant.

    While the fine itself may be manageable for a large retailer, the reputational and operational consequences of non-compliance can be significant. The CPPA’s increasing activity sends a clear signal: businesses must take consumer privacy seriously, or face the consequences.

    As California continues to lead the way in privacy protection, businesses across the country and beyond are expected to align their practices with its standards. The case against Todd Snyder is one of many — and it likely won’t be the last.

    Source: Read More

    Facebook Twitter Reddit Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleResearchers Uncover Malware in Fake Discord PyPI Package Downloaded 11,500+ Times
    Next Article CISA Adds Actively Exploited Broadcom and Commvault Flaws to KEV Database

    Related Posts

    Development

    GPT-5 is Coming: Revolutionizing Software Testing

    July 22, 2025
    Development

    Win the Accessibility Game: Combining AI with Human Judgment

    July 22, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    For security, use of Google's reCAPTCHA service is required which is subject to the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

    Continue Reading

    Running Multiple Test Cases from a CSV File Using Playwright and TypeScript.

    Development

    CVE-2025-48487 – FreeScout Flash Message Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability

    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)

    Linux Data Recovery: How to Salvage Lost or Corrupted Files

    Learning Resources

    Amazon DynamoDB data modeling for Multi-Tenancy – Part 1

    Databases

    Highlights

    CVE-2025-7790 – D-Link DI-8100 HTTP Request Handler Stack-Based Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

    July 18, 2025

    CVE ID : CVE-2025-7790

    Published : July 18, 2025, 4:15 p.m. | 1 hour, 3 minutes ago

    Description : A vulnerability was found in D-Link DI-8100 16.07.26A1. It has been classified as critical. This affects an unknown part of the file /menu_nat.asp of the component HTTP Request Handler. The manipulation of the argument out_addr/in_addr/out_port/proto leads to stack-based buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

    Severity: 8.8 | HIGH

    Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more…

    WinRAR patches bug letting malware launch from extracted archives

    June 25, 2025

    The Elder Scrolls 4: Oblivion Remastered leaks with screenshots

    April 15, 2025

    CVE-2024-9771 – WordPress WP-Recall Stored Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability

    April 28, 2025
    © DevStackTips 2025. All rights reserved.
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.