Close Menu
    DevStackTipsDevStackTips
    • Home
    • News & Updates
      1. Tech & Work
      2. View All

      CodeSOD: A Unique Way to Primary Key

      July 22, 2025

      BrowserStack launches Figma plugin for detecting accessibility issues in design phase

      July 22, 2025

      Parasoft brings agentic AI to service virtualization in latest release

      July 22, 2025

      Node.js vs. Python for Backend: 7 Reasons C-Level Leaders Choose Node.js Talent

      July 21, 2025

      The best CRM software with email marketing in 2025: Expert tested and reviewed

      July 22, 2025

      This multi-port car charger can power 4 gadgets at once – and it’s surprisingly cheap

      July 22, 2025

      I’m a wearables editor and here are the 7 Pixel Watch 4 rumors I’m most curious about

      July 22, 2025

      8 ways I quickly leveled up my Linux skills – and you can too

      July 22, 2025
    • Development
      1. Algorithms & Data Structures
      2. Artificial Intelligence
      3. Back-End Development
      4. Databases
      5. Front-End Development
      6. Libraries & Frameworks
      7. Machine Learning
      8. Security
      9. Software Engineering
      10. Tools & IDEs
      11. Web Design
      12. Web Development
      13. Web Security
      14. Programming Languages
        • PHP
        • JavaScript
      Featured

      The Intersection of Agile and Accessibility – A Series on Designing for Everyone

      July 22, 2025
      Recent

      The Intersection of Agile and Accessibility – A Series on Designing for Everyone

      July 22, 2025

      Zero Trust & Cybersecurity Mesh: Your Org’s Survival Guide

      July 22, 2025

      Execute Ping Commands and Get Back Structured Data in PHP

      July 22, 2025
    • Operating Systems
      1. Windows
      2. Linux
      3. macOS
      Featured

      A Tomb Raider composer has been jailed — His legacy overshadowed by $75k+ in loan fraud

      July 22, 2025
      Recent

      A Tomb Raider composer has been jailed — His legacy overshadowed by $75k+ in loan fraud

      July 22, 2025

      “I don’t think I changed his mind” — NVIDIA CEO comments on H20 AI GPU sales resuming in China following a meeting with President Trump

      July 22, 2025

      Galaxy Z Fold 7 review: Six years later — Samsung finally cracks the foldable code

      July 22, 2025
    • Learning Resources
      • Books
      • Cheatsheets
      • Tutorials & Guides
    Home»Development»Inside the Mind of the Adversary: Why More Security Leaders Are Selecting AEV

    Inside the Mind of the Adversary: Why More Security Leaders Are Selecting AEV

    June 6, 2025

    Cybersecurity involves both playing the good guy and the bad guy. Diving deep into advanced technologies and yet also going rogue in the Dark Web. Defining technical policies and also profiling attacker behavior. Security teams cannot be focused on just ticking boxes, they need to inhabit the attacker’s mindset.
    This is where AEV comes in.
    AEV (Adversarial Exposure Validation) is an advanced

    Source: Read More

    Facebook Twitter Reddit Email Copy Link
    Previous ArticleCISA Issues 7 ICS Advisories Targeting Critical Infrastructure Flaws
    Next Article He Hacked Servers, Not People — But Still Left a $4.5 Million Mess Behind

    Related Posts

    Development

    GPT-5 is Coming: Revolutionizing Software Testing

    July 22, 2025
    Development

    Win the Accessibility Game: Combining AI with Human Judgment

    July 22, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    For security, use of Google's reCAPTCHA service is required which is subject to the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

    Continue Reading

    “We want our game franchises to be as big as possible” — Xbox Game Studios head talks Play Anywhere and bringing titles across multiple devices

    News & Updates

    CVE-2025-41238 – VMware ESXi, Workstation, and Fusion PVSCSI Heap-Overflow Privilege Escalation Vulnerability

    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)

    CVE-2025-45746 – ZKT ZKBio CVSecurity Hardcoded JWT Secret Authentication Bypass

    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)

    CVE-2025-44531 – Realtek RTL8762EKF-EVB Bluetooth Denial of Service

    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)

    Highlights

    CVE-2025-38351 – KVM Hyper-V Canonical GVA Vulnerability

    July 19, 2025

    CVE ID : CVE-2025-38351

    Published : July 19, 2025, 12:15 p.m. | 11 hours, 38 minutes ago

    Description : In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

    KVM: x86/hyper-v: Skip non-canonical addresses during PV TLB flush

    In KVM guests with Hyper-V hypercalls enabled, the hypercalls
    HVCALL_FLUSH_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS_LIST and HVCALL_FLUSH_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS_LIST_EX
    allow a guest to request invalidation of portions of a virtual TLB.
    For this, the hypercall parameter includes a list of GVAs that are supposed
    to be invalidated.

    However, when non-canonical GVAs are passed, there is currently no
    filtering in place and they are eventually passed to checked invocations of
    INVVPID on Intel / INVLPGA on AMD. While AMD’s INVLPGA silently ignores
    non-canonical addresses (effectively a no-op), Intel’s INVVPID explicitly
    signals VM-Fail and ultimately triggers the WARN_ONCE in invvpid_error():

    invvpid failed: ext=0x0 vpid=1 gva=0xaaaaaaaaaaaaa000
    WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 326 at arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c:482
    invvpid_error+0x91/0xa0 [kvm_intel]
    Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm 9pnet_virtio irqbypass fuse
    CPU: 6 UID: 0 PID: 326 Comm: kvm-vm Not tainted 6.15.0 #14 PREEMPT(voluntary)
    RIP: 0010:invvpid_error+0x91/0xa0 [kvm_intel]
    Call Trace:
    vmx_flush_tlb_gva+0x320/0x490 [kvm_intel]
    kvm_hv_vcpu_flush_tlb+0x24f/0x4f0 [kvm]
    kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x3013/0x5810 [kvm]

    Hyper-V documents that invalid GVAs (those that are beyond a partition’s
    GVA space) are to be ignored. While not completely clear whether this
    ruling also applies to non-canonical GVAs, it is likely fine to make that
    assumption, and manual testing on Azure confirms “real” Hyper-V interprets
    the specification in the same way.

    Skip non-canonical GVAs when processing the list of address to avoid
    tripping the INVVPID failure. Alternatively, KVM could filter out “bad”
    GVAs before inserting into the FIFO, but practically speaking the only
    downside of pushing validation to the final processing is that doing so
    is suboptimal for the guest, and no well-behaved guest will request TLB
    flushes for non-canonical addresses.

    Severity: 0.0 | NA

    Visit the link for more details, such as CVSS details, affected products, timeline, and more…

    CVE-2025-23376 – Dell PowerProtect Data Manager Template Engine Template Injection Vulnerability

    April 28, 2025

    Hitachi Energy’s Asset Suite Hit by Multiple Critical Vulnerabilities

    June 1, 2025

    shotgun is a minimal screenshot utility for X11

    April 3, 2025
    © DevStackTips 2025. All rights reserved.
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.