Close Menu
    DevStackTipsDevStackTips
    • Home
    • News & Updates
      1. Tech & Work
      2. View All

      CodeSOD: A Unique Way to Primary Key

      July 22, 2025

      BrowserStack launches Figma plugin for detecting accessibility issues in design phase

      July 22, 2025

      Parasoft brings agentic AI to service virtualization in latest release

      July 22, 2025

      Node.js vs. Python for Backend: 7 Reasons C-Level Leaders Choose Node.js Talent

      July 21, 2025

      The best CRM software with email marketing in 2025: Expert tested and reviewed

      July 22, 2025

      This multi-port car charger can power 4 gadgets at once – and it’s surprisingly cheap

      July 22, 2025

      I’m a wearables editor and here are the 7 Pixel Watch 4 rumors I’m most curious about

      July 22, 2025

      8 ways I quickly leveled up my Linux skills – and you can too

      July 22, 2025
    • Development
      1. Algorithms & Data Structures
      2. Artificial Intelligence
      3. Back-End Development
      4. Databases
      5. Front-End Development
      6. Libraries & Frameworks
      7. Machine Learning
      8. Security
      9. Software Engineering
      10. Tools & IDEs
      11. Web Design
      12. Web Development
      13. Web Security
      14. Programming Languages
        • PHP
        • JavaScript
      Featured

      The Intersection of Agile and Accessibility – A Series on Designing for Everyone

      July 22, 2025
      Recent

      The Intersection of Agile and Accessibility – A Series on Designing for Everyone

      July 22, 2025

      Zero Trust & Cybersecurity Mesh: Your Org’s Survival Guide

      July 22, 2025

      Execute Ping Commands and Get Back Structured Data in PHP

      July 22, 2025
    • Operating Systems
      1. Windows
      2. Linux
      3. macOS
      Featured

      A Tomb Raider composer has been jailed — His legacy overshadowed by $75k+ in loan fraud

      July 22, 2025
      Recent

      A Tomb Raider composer has been jailed — His legacy overshadowed by $75k+ in loan fraud

      July 22, 2025

      “I don’t think I changed his mind” — NVIDIA CEO comments on H20 AI GPU sales resuming in China following a meeting with President Trump

      July 22, 2025

      Galaxy Z Fold 7 review: Six years later — Samsung finally cracks the foldable code

      July 22, 2025
    • Learning Resources
      • Books
      • Cheatsheets
      • Tutorials & Guides
    Home»Development»Machine Learning»Building High-Performance Financial Analytics Pipelines with Polars: Lazy Evaluation, Advanced Expressions, and SQL Integration

    Building High-Performance Financial Analytics Pipelines with Polars: Lazy Evaluation, Advanced Expressions, and SQL Integration

    June 17, 2025

    In this tutorial, we delve into building an advanced data analytics pipeline using Polars, a lightning-fast DataFrame library designed for optimal performance and scalability. Our goal is to demonstrate how we can utilize Polars’ lazy evaluation, complex expressions, window functions, and SQL interface to process large-scale financial datasets efficiently. We begin by generating a synthetic financial time series dataset and move step-by-step through an end-to-end pipeline, from feature engineering and rolling statistics to multi-dimensional analysis and ranking. Throughout, we demonstrate how Polars empowers us to write expressive and performant data transformations, all while maintaining low memory usage and ensuring fast execution.

    Copy CodeCopiedUse a different Browser
    import polars as pl
    import numpy as np
    from datetime import datetime, timedelta
    import io
    
    
    try:
        import polars as pl
    except ImportError:
        import subprocess
        subprocess.run(["pip", "install", "polars"], check=True)
        import polars as pl
    
    
    print("🚀 Advanced Polars Analytics Pipeline")
    print("=" * 50)

    We begin by importing the essential libraries, including Polars for high-performance DataFrame operations and NumPy for generating synthetic data. To ensure compatibility, we add a fallback installation step for Polars in case it isn’t already installed. With the setup ready, we signal the start of our advanced analytics pipeline.

    Copy CodeCopiedUse a different Browser
    np.random.seed(42)
    n_records = 100000
    dates = [datetime(2020, 1, 1) + timedelta(days=i//100) for i in range(n_records)]
    tickers = np.random.choice(['AAPL', 'GOOGL', 'MSFT', 'TSLA', 'AMZN'], n_records)
    
    
    # Create complex synthetic dataset
    data = {
        'timestamp': dates,
        'ticker': tickers,
        'price': np.random.lognormal(4, 0.3, n_records),
        'volume': np.random.exponential(1000000, n_records).astype(int),
        'bid_ask_spread': np.random.exponential(0.01, n_records),
        'market_cap': np.random.lognormal(25, 1, n_records),
        'sector': np.random.choice(['Tech', 'Finance', 'Healthcare', 'Energy'], n_records)
    }
    
    
    print(f"📊 Generated {n_records:,} synthetic financial records")

    We generate a rich, synthetic financial dataset with 100,000 records using NumPy, simulating daily stock data for major tickers such as AAPL and TSLA. Each entry includes key market features such as price, volume, bid-ask spread, market cap, and sector. This provides a realistic foundation for demonstrating advanced Polars analytics on a time-series dataset.

    Copy CodeCopiedUse a different Browser
    lf = pl.LazyFrame(data)
    
    
    result = (
        lf
        .with_columns([
            pl.col('timestamp').dt.year().alias('year'),
            pl.col('timestamp').dt.month().alias('month'),
            pl.col('timestamp').dt.weekday().alias('weekday'),
            pl.col('timestamp').dt.quarter().alias('quarter')
        ])
       
        .with_columns([
            pl.col('price').rolling_mean(20).over('ticker').alias('sma_20'),
            pl.col('price').rolling_std(20).over('ticker').alias('volatility_20'),
           
            pl.col('price').ewm_mean(span=12).over('ticker').alias('ema_12'),
           
            pl.col('price').diff().alias('price_diff'),
           
            (pl.col('volume') * pl.col('price')).alias('dollar_volume')
        ])
       
        .with_columns([
            pl.col('price_diff').clip(0, None).rolling_mean(14).over('ticker').alias('rsi_up'),
            pl.col('price_diff').abs().rolling_mean(14).over('ticker').alias('rsi_down'),
           
            (pl.col('price') - pl.col('sma_20')).alias('bb_position')
        ])
       
        .with_columns([
            (100 - (100 / (1 + pl.col('rsi_up') / pl.col('rsi_down')))).alias('rsi')
        ])
       
        .filter(
            (pl.col('price') > 10) &
            (pl.col('volume') > 100000) &
            (pl.col('sma_20').is_not_null())
        )
       
        .group_by(['ticker', 'year', 'quarter'])
        .agg([
            pl.col('price').mean().alias('avg_price'),
            pl.col('price').std().alias('price_volatility'),
            pl.col('price').min().alias('min_price'),
            pl.col('price').max().alias('max_price'),
            pl.col('price').quantile(0.5).alias('median_price'),
           
            pl.col('volume').sum().alias('total_volume'),
            pl.col('dollar_volume').sum().alias('total_dollar_volume'),
           
            pl.col('rsi').filter(pl.col('rsi').is_not_null()).mean().alias('avg_rsi'),
            pl.col('volatility_20').mean().alias('avg_volatility'),
            pl.col('bb_position').std().alias('bollinger_deviation'),
           
            pl.len().alias('trading_days'),
            pl.col('sector').n_unique().alias('sectors_count'),
           
            (pl.col('price') > pl.col('sma_20')).mean().alias('above_sma_ratio'),
           
            ((pl.col('price').max() - pl.col('price').min()) / pl.col('price').min())
              .alias('price_range_pct')
        ])
       
        .with_columns([
            pl.col('total_dollar_volume').rank(method='ordinal', descending=True).alias('volume_rank'),
            pl.col('price_volatility').rank(method='ordinal', descending=True).alias('volatility_rank')
        ])
       
        .filter(pl.col('trading_days') >= 10)
        .sort(['ticker', 'year', 'quarter'])
    )
    

    We load our synthetic dataset into a Polars LazyFrame to enable deferred execution, allowing us to chain complex transformations efficiently. From there, we enrich the data with time-based features and apply advanced technical indicators, such as moving averages, RSI, and Bollinger bands, using window and rolling functions. We then perform grouped aggregations by ticker, year, and quarter to extract key financial statistics and indicators. Finally, we rank the results based on volume and volatility, filter out under-traded segments, and sort the data for intuitive exploration, all while leveraging Polars’ powerful lazy evaluation engine to its full advantage.

    Copy CodeCopiedUse a different Browser
    df = result.collect()
    print(f"n📈 Analysis Results: {df.height:,} aggregated records")
    print("nTop 10 High-Volume Quarters:")
    print(df.sort('total_dollar_volume', descending=True).head(10).to_pandas())
    
    
    print("n🔍 Advanced Analytics:")
    
    
    pivot_analysis = (
        df.group_by('ticker')
        .agg([
            pl.col('avg_price').mean().alias('overall_avg_price'),
            pl.col('price_volatility').mean().alias('overall_volatility'),
            pl.col('total_dollar_volume').sum().alias('lifetime_volume'),
            pl.col('above_sma_ratio').mean().alias('momentum_score'),
            pl.col('price_range_pct').mean().alias('avg_range_pct')
        ])
        .with_columns([
            (pl.col('overall_avg_price') / pl.col('overall_volatility')).alias('risk_adj_score'),
           
            (pl.col('momentum_score') * 0.4 +
             pl.col('avg_range_pct') * 0.3 +
             (pl.col('lifetime_volume') / pl.col('lifetime_volume').max()) * 0.3)
             .alias('composite_score')
        ])
        .sort('composite_score', descending=True)
    )
    
    
    print("n🏆 Ticker Performance Ranking:")
    print(pivot_analysis.to_pandas())

    Once our lazy pipeline is complete, we collect the results into a DataFrame and immediately review the top 10 quarters based on total dollar volume. This helps us identify periods of intense trading activity. We then take our analysis a step further by grouping the data by ticker to compute higher-level insights, such as lifetime trading volume, average price volatility, and a custom composite score. This multi-dimensional summary helps us compare stocks not just by raw volume, but also by momentum and risk-adjusted performance, unlocking deeper insights into overall ticker behavior.

    Copy CodeCopiedUse a different Browser
    print("n🔄 SQL Interface Demo:")
    pl.Config.set_tbl_rows(5)
    
    
    sql_result = pl.sql("""
        SELECT
            ticker,
            AVG(avg_price) as mean_price,
            STDDEV(price_volatility) as volatility_consistency,
            SUM(total_dollar_volume) as total_volume,
            COUNT(*) as quarters_tracked
        FROM df
        WHERE year >= 2021
        GROUP BY ticker
        ORDER BY total_volume DESC
    """, eager=True)
    
    
    print(sql_result)
    
    
    print(f"n⚡ Performance Metrics:")
    print(f"   • Lazy evaluation optimizations applied")
    print(f"   • {n_records:,} records processed efficiently")
    print(f"   • Memory-efficient columnar operations")
    print(f"   • Zero-copy operations where possible")
    
    
    print(f"n💾 Export Options:")
    print("   • Parquet (high compression): df.write_parquet('data.parquet')")
    print("   • Delta Lake: df.write_delta('delta_table')")
    print("   • JSON streaming: df.write_ndjson('data.jsonl')")
    print("   • Apache Arrow: df.to_arrow()")
    
    
    print("n✅ Advanced Polars pipeline completed successfully!")
    print("🎯 Demonstrated: Lazy evaluation, complex expressions, window functions,")
    print("   SQL interface, advanced aggregations, and high-performance analytics")

    We wrap up the pipeline by showcasing Polars’ elegant SQL interface, running an aggregate query to analyze post-2021 ticker performance with familiar SQL syntax. This hybrid capability enables us to blend expressive Polars transformations with declarative SQL queries seamlessly. To highlight its efficiency, we print key performance metrics, emphasizing lazy evaluation, memory efficiency, and zero-copy execution. Finally, we demonstrate how easily we can export results in various formats, such as Parquet, Arrow, and JSONL, making this pipeline both powerful and production-ready. With that, we complete a full-circle, high-performance analytics workflow using Polars.

    In conclusion, we’ve seen firsthand how Polars’ lazy API can optimize complex analytics workflows that would otherwise be sluggish in traditional tools. We’ve developed a comprehensive financial analysis pipeline, spanning from raw data ingestion to rolling indicators, grouped aggregations, and advanced scoring, all executed with blazing speed. Not only that, but we also tapped into Polars’ powerful SQL interface to run familiar queries seamlessly over our DataFrames. This dual ability to write both functional-style expressions and SQL makes Polars an incredibly flexible tool for any data scientist.


    Check out the Paper. All credit for this research goes to the researchers of this project. Also, feel free to follow us on Twitter and don’t forget to join our 100k+ ML SubReddit and Subscribe to our Newsletter.

    The post Building High-Performance Financial Analytics Pipelines with Polars: Lazy Evaluation, Advanced Expressions, and SQL Integration appeared first on MarkTechPost.

    Source: Read More 

    Facebook Twitter Reddit Email Copy Link
    Previous Articlestateless in REST
    Next Article From Fine-Tuning to Prompt Engineering: Theory and Practice for Efficient Transformer Adaptation

    Related Posts

    Machine Learning

    How to Evaluate Jailbreak Methods: A Case Study with the StrongREJECT Benchmark

    July 22, 2025
    Machine Learning

    Boolformer: Symbolic Regression of Logic Functions with Transformers

    July 22, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    For security, use of Google's reCAPTCHA service is required which is subject to the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

    Continue Reading

    Newly Emerged GLOBAL GROUP RaaS Expands Operations with AI-Driven Negotiation Tools

    Development

    CVE-2025-6200 – GeoDirectory Stored Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability

    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)

    CVE-2025-6347 – Code-Projects Responsive Blog Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability

    Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)

    The rise of AI PCs: How businesses are reshaping their tech to keep up

    News & Updates

    Highlights

    Double Injection Risk in NVIDIA Megatron-LM: Code Execution Flaws Patched in v0.12.1

    June 24, 2025

    Double Injection Risk in NVIDIA Megatron-LM: Code Execution Flaws Patched in v0.12.1

    NVIDIA has released a security bulletin addressing two newly discovered vulnerabilities—CVE-2025-23264 and CVE-2025-23265—affecting Megatron-LM, its open-source large language model (LLM) framework de …
    Read more

    Published Date:
    Jun 25, 2025 (1 hour, 5 minutes ago)

    Vulnerabilities has been mentioned in this article.

    CVE-2025-23265

    CVE-2025-23264

    CVE-2024-0138

    CVE-2025-53867 – Island Lake WebBatch Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

    July 17, 2025

    North Korean Hackers Spread Malware via Fake Crypto Firms and Job Interview Lures

    April 25, 2025

    zgenom – lightweight and fast plugin manager for Zsh

    June 4, 2025
    © DevStackTips 2025. All rights reserved.
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.